tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6925564314841230168.post4485862871982543006..comments2024-03-05T18:58:42.930-05:00Comments on Eastern Impressions: Western Printmakers and the Orient: Asian Art Deco #1: Dorsey Potter TysonDarrel C. Karlhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07622338980803023229noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6925564314841230168.post-83171052930770579932021-05-15T10:03:04.731-04:002021-05-15T10:03:04.731-04:00Thank you; just sent.Thank you; just sent.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17818202345029151372noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6925564314841230168.post-20557563571804812772021-05-15T09:43:24.844-04:002021-05-15T09:43:24.844-04:00If you send me an image of the "numbering&quo...If you send me an image of the "numbering" to the e-mail address at the upper right of this page, I will do my best to decipher it. My best guess without seeing anything is that they are roman numbers for a test proof.Darrel C. Karlhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07622338980803023229noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6925564314841230168.post-56355017068725213972021-05-15T09:38:36.084-04:002021-05-15T09:38:36.084-04:00I have a print of the Loading Junks etching, but t...I have a print of the Loading Junks etching, but the "numbering" is odd and would love help in determining what it indicates. Researching the print, I see others which actually show a print number (like 54/100), but this print shows letters- something like a sideways H/A. Thanks.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17818202345029151372noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6925564314841230168.post-19791164307601725572021-02-20T16:45:42.321-05:002021-02-20T16:45:42.321-05:00I would have added it to the list if it weren'...I would have added it to the list if it weren't there already.Darrel C. Karlhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07622338980803023229noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6925564314841230168.post-45011428102251565002021-02-20T16:43:04.135-05:002021-02-20T16:43:04.135-05:00Ooops. It is Goose Boy #65. SorryOoops. It is Goose Boy #65. SorryPFSpencerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04249272475973174687noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6925564314841230168.post-37499341975350094282021-02-20T16:41:29.181-05:002021-02-20T16:41:29.181-05:00We have Tyson's "Goose Girl" which d...We have Tyson's "Goose Girl" which does not appear here. PFSpencerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04249272475973174687noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6925564314841230168.post-66024278241401664932020-04-16T11:21:07.555-04:002020-04-16T11:21:07.555-04:00Thank you. I'll add the title and date to the...Thank you. I'll add the title and date to the image.Darrel C. Karlhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07622338980803023229noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6925564314841230168.post-7533615030481949122020-04-16T11:09:35.856-04:002020-04-16T11:09:35.856-04:00RE the spaniel bronze - it is a Sussex (I am an hi...RE the spaniel bronze - it is a Sussex (I am an historian for the breed) and I found a listing for it in the 1931 catalog of copyright entries. p 29 Patsy. (Dog, short legged, with shaggy hair, long ears and short tail. Mar 31 1931; G 5850. Link to internet archive copy of the catalog.<br />https://archive.org/details/catalogofcopyrig264libr/page/28/mode/2up/search/dorsey<br />Ki BarnesAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11270988131345544854noreply@blogger.com